Q2 2024 Earnings Summary
- Strong demand from data center customers is driving Constellation's progress on colocation deals, which could be announced even before regulatory processes conclude, signaling significant growth opportunities for the company.
- The tightening energy market and higher capacity prices in PJM are increasing the urgency among customers to secure Constellation's clean and reliable energy offerings, enhancing the company's market position.
- Despite some regulatory noise, policymakers and customers are supportive of Constellation's colocation strategy, recognizing the economic benefits and the advantage of having clean energy centers, which strengthens the company's outlook.
- Regulatory uncertainty regarding the co-location strategy could delay deal announcements and impact growth plans. The ongoing FERC technical conference may slow down timelines as customers seek certainty.
- Public disputes and regulatory challenges may negatively impact customer relationships and ability to close deals. The contentious process has attracted attention from customers and policymakers, potentially affecting negotiations.
- Concerns exist about whether the PJM capacity market will bring new capacity fast enough, possibly leading to utilities rate-basing peaking plants, which could impact competitive dynamics. This could affect CEG's position if utilities build rate-based generation in response.
-
Colocation Deal Timing
Q: Will FERC proceedings delay colocation deals?
A: Management believes that while the FERC technical conference could slow things down for those seeking certainty, they don't need to wait until the end of the FERC process to announce deals. Contractual provisions will handle contingencies, and they could see deals announced even as the process continues. -
Increased Urgency After PJM Auction
Q: Does the PJM auction outcome increase urgency for data center deals?
A: Yes, the tightening market from the PJM auction has increased urgency for data center customers to lock down colocation deals, especially for clean and reliable megawatts, creating a huge opportunity for the company. -
Dual-Unit Plants Preferred
Q: Are dual-unit plants preferred for data center colocation?
A: While dual-unit plants make sense with one unit acting as backup, management is exploring various configurations depending on the data center type. They foresee situations where behind-the-meter data centers are near on-grid centers, providing reliability through fiber. They're in early stages but believe dual-unit sites are the most natural choice initially. -
Customer Concerns Over Public Scrutiny
Q: Is public scrutiny affecting customer deals?
A: Not yet. Customers and policymakers are paying attention, but management aims to resolve issues amicably to avoid distractions. Policymakers want these projects to happen, and the company prefers working in a way that's friendly to both policymakers and customers. -
State Legislative Focus
Q: What are your state legislative priorities for colocation?
A: The company is largely reactive but will work with customers and labor unions to ensure opportunities for economic growth remain available. They are not planning to launch legislation, handling these issues in the regulatory arena like past cogeneration projects. -
Ratepayer Benefits from Colocation
Q: What's the benefit to ratepayers from a 1 GW colocation?
A: Management notes that building a 1 GW data center elsewhere could cost billions , often socialized to customers. With colocation, hyperscalers pay for the connection at the plant, costing a fraction. They see potentially a 10× cost difference, reducing the burden on ratepayers and offering timely, feasible solutions.